|
Welcome
We Believe
Board
Please Write Us
New Borns:
RB
Islam-Israel Fellowship
RB
Jerusalem Embassy Initiative
RB Noahide
Fellowship
Embryos:
RB Bible Codes
Fellowship
RB China-Israel
Fellowship
RB Counter Missionary
Group
RB Ecology
Fellowship
RB Hebrew Language
Fellowship
RB Ibereo-Israel
Fellowship
RB India-Israel
Fellowship
RB Japan-Israel
Fellowship
RB Lost Tribes
Fellowship
RB Media
Fellowship
RB Natural Healing
Fellowship
RB Science
Fellowship
RB Temple
Fellowship
| |
NO AUTHENTIC THEOLOGICAL REASON WHY MUSLIMS
SHOULD NOT RECOGNIZE THE STATE OF ISRAEL - AM YISROEL CHAI!
by Sheikh Professor Abdul Hadi Palazzi
JERUSALEM, July 2, 1998, Root & Branch:
From an Islamic point of view, is there any
fundamental reason which prohibits Muslims from recognizing
Israel as a friendly State?
I realize that a negative answer to the above
question is taken for granted by popular opinion. My
approach, however, is not based on popular opinion or the
current political situation, but on a theological analysis of
authentic Islamic sources.
Viewing the Jewish return to Israel as a
Western invasion and Zionists as recent colonizers is new. It
has no basis in authentic Islamic faith. According to the Qur'an, no person, people or religious community can claim a
permanent right of possession over any territory. The Earth
belongs exclusively to G-d, and He is free to entrust
sovereignty over land to whomever He likes for whatever time
period that He chooses.
"Say: 'O God, King of the kingdom
(1), Thou givest the kingdom to whom Thou pleasest, and
Thou strippest off the kingdom from whom Thou pleasest;
Thou endowest with honour whom Thou pleasest, and Thou
bringest low whom Thou pleasest: all the best is in Thy
hand. Verily, Thou hast power over all things.'"(2) (Qur'an 3:26)
From the above Qur'anic verse we deduce a
basic principle of the Monotheistic philosophy of history:
G-d chooses as He likes in the relationship between peoples
and countries. Sometimes He gives a land to a people, and
sometimes He takes His possession back and gives it to
another people. In general, we can say that He gives as a
reward for faithfulness and takes back as a punishment for
wickedness, but this rule does not permit us to say that
God's ways are always plain and clear to our eyes, since His
secrets are inaccessible to the human intellect.
Using Islam as a basis for preventing Arabs
from recognizing any sovereign right of Jews over the Land of
Israel is new. Such beliefs are not found in classical
Islamic sources. Concluding that anti-Zionism is the logical
outgrowth of Islamic faith is wrong. This conclusion
represents the false transformation of Islam from a religion
into a secularized ideology.
Such a false transformation of Islam was in
fact made by the late Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin
el-Husseini. He is the one person most responsible, both
morally and materially, for the repeated Arab defeats in
their conflict with the Jews in Israel. Husseni not only
incited Arabs against Jews. He also encouraged the torture
and murder of all Arabs who correctly understood that Arab
cooperation with Jews was a precious opportunity for the
development of the Land of Israel. Husseini ended his woeful
life by putting his perverted religious teachings at the
service of the evil and pagan Nazis.
After Husseini came Jamal al-Din 'Abd
al-Nasser. Nasser based his policy on Pan-Arabism, hatred and
contempt for Jews, and an alliance with the atheistic Soviet
Union. Nasser's terrible choices were critical factors in
maintaining Arab backwardness. Fortunately, most of Nasser's
mistakes were afterward corrected by the martyr Anwar Sadat.
(3)
After the defeat of Nasserianism, Islamic
fundamentalist movements made anti-Zionism the primary
feature of their propaganda. They presented the negation of
any Jewish rights to the Land of Israel as rooted in
authentic Islam and derived from authentic Islamic religious
principles.
The Land of Israel in Qur'anic Exegisis
The fundamentalist Muslim program to use
Islam as an instrument for political warfare against Jews
finds a major obstacle in the Qur'an itself. Both the Bible
and the Qur'an state quite clearly that the right of the
Israelites to the Land of Israel does not depend on conquest
and colonization. This right flows from the will of almighty
G-d Himself.
Both the Jewish and Islamic Scriptures teach
that G-d, through His chosen servant Moses, decided to free
the offspring of Jacob from slavery in Egypt and to
constitute them as heirs of the Promised Land. Whoever claims
that Jewish sovereignty over the Land of Israel is something
new and rooted in human politics denies divine revelation and
divine prophecy as explicitly expressed in our Holy Books
(the Bible and Qur'an).
The Qur'an relates the words by which Moses
ordered the Israelites to conquer the Land:
"And [remember] when Moses said to
his people: 'O my people, call in remembrance the favour
of G-d unto you, when he produced prophets among you,
made you kings, and gave to you what He had not given to
any other among the peoples. O my people, enter the Holy
Land which G-d has assigned unto you, and turn not back
ignominiously, for then will ye be overthrown, to your
own ruin.'" (4) (Qur'an 5:20-21)
Moreover - and those who try to use Islam as
a weapon against Israel always conveniently ignore this point
- the Holy Qur'an explicitly refers to the return of the Jews
to the Land of Israel before the Last Judgment - where it
says:
"And thereafter We [Allah] said to
the Children of Israel: 'Dwell securely in the Promised
Land. And when the last warning will come to pass, we
will gather you together in a mingled crowd.'" (5) (Qur'an 17:104)
Therefore, from an Islamic point of view,
there is NO fundamental reason which prohibits Muslims from
recognizing Israel as a friendly State. Am Yisroel Chai!
Sheikh Professor Abdul Hadi Palazzi,
Rome, Italy
-------------------------------------------------
Notes:
The original Arabic word we
translated as "kingdom" is mulk, from a
Semitic root m-l-k, that is common to both Arabic and
Hebrew. According to Islamic theological terminology,
the three synonyms for "kingdom" are mulk,
malakūt and jabarūt. They refer respectively to the
physical, psychical and spiritual levels of
existence. Of course, G-d can be called King of all
of them; if here only mulk is quoted, it depends on
the fact that this verse directly concerns the
earthly domain. To denote a kingdom in the secular
and political sense, Arabic commonly uses another
derived form, that is mamlakah.
Qur'an 3:26. For typographical
reasons, it is not possible to reproduce here the
original Arabic text of the Qur'an, which must
nevertheless be understood as quoted. As well here as
in other Qur'anic quotations, the English translation
of the meaning of Qur'anic words from Arabic is my
own, but based on the most authoritative English
commentaries, such as M. Marmaduke Pickthall's
"The Meaning of The Glorious Qur'an" (Beirut
1973), 'A. Yūsuf 'Ali, "The Holy Qur'an - Text,
Translation and Commentary" (Maryland 1983) and
A. 'A. Maududi "The Holy Qur'an - Text,
Translation and Brief Notes" (Lahore 1986).
In using the term "martyr"
I do not simply refer to one who lost his life for a
good cause. I give a precise translation of the
Arabic word "shahid," which identifies a
"martyr" in the strictly religious sense;
that is to say, someone who spent his life serving
the cause of G-d. Since making peace with former
enemies is an explicit Qur'anic order (see Qur'an 8:61), and since, according to Islam, Peace is G-d
Himself, any believer who is killed because of his
search for Peace must be understood as a religious
martyr. The same considerations clearly apply to
Yitzhak Rabin.
Qur'an 5:20-21 (emphasis added).
Qur'an 17:104 (emphasis added).
|